System for displaying material characteristic information

ABSTRACT

A system for displaying graphical information indicative of a plurality of material characteristics for a portion of a part under test. Energy is directed at the selected portion of the part under test. Resultant energy is detected from the selected portion of the part under test and data representative of each of a plurality of material characteristics for the portion of the part under test is obtained based, at least in part, upon the detected energy. A plurality of graphs is formed based upon the obtained data. Each of the graphs has information indicative of a separate one of the plurality of material characteristics. The plurality of graphs is displayed discrete from each other in a manner that facilitates substantially simultaneous visual comparisons between the information contained in each of the plurality of graphs.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a division of prior application Ser. No. 10/706,385, filed onNov. 12, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,265,754, which is hereby incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to systems and methods for displaying a pluralityof material characteristics in a format that facilitates comparisonsbetween the characteristics.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The failure of fatigue-limited components in various types of systemsoften leads to undesirable or tragic consequences. For instance, thefailure of a critical component of a jet engine during the operation ofthe engine may result in the loss of human life or other tragic results.Directed energy measurement techniques have been developed to test thesecritical components, detect defective components, and preventundesirable situations from ever taking place.

Typically, directed energy measurement techniques involve directingenergy at a part under test and sensing the resulting diffracted energyand/or attenuated energy. If a diffraction technique is used, theresulting sensed diffraction peak is interpreted to arrive at ameasurement of a material characteristic. With energy attenuationtechniques, the amount of energy that is absorbed by the material isdetermined and this amount is used to determine the same or additionaltypes of material characteristics.

The material characteristics of the part under test often are related tostress. For example, stress may be determined along or under the surfaceof the part under test. Additionally, the error present in measuringstress (stress error) may be calculated. If multiple sensors are used todetect diffracted energy, the ratio of two stress measurements, asdetermined at the two different sensors (intensity ratio), can bedetermined.

Another characteristic that can be determined is the average peakbreadth of the stress measurement. This is usually defined as the widthof the Gausian distribution of stress as measured at a sensor. Averagefull width half magnitude (FWHM) (average full width at half maximum ofthe Gausian function for stress as measured at a sensor) may also bedetermined.

The shear stress can also be determined. Further, a stress tensor may bedetermined by taking multiple measurements of stress and determining themagnitude and direction of the stress in the part under test. An errortensor, relating to the magnitude and direction of error in the stresstensor, can also be calculated. Stress may also be determined as afunction of position in the x-direction or as a function of position inthe y-direction. The maximum stress in any direction (equivalent stress)may also be obtained. Other characteristics can also be determined.

After the material characteristics have been determined, it is oftendesirable to display this information to an operator of the measurementequipment. For instance, the values of these characteristics can bemapped into two or three-dimensional graphs and displayed to theoperator using a video terminal. However, present systems and methodsonly display a graph relating to a single material characteristic of thepart under test.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, a method and system areprovided that enable optimized part analysis based on several differentmeasured characteristics of the part. In this regard, part testing isused to generate raw data from which measurement values are generatedfor the different characteristics of the part material with themeasurement values for each characteristic graphed and displayed in amanner that facilitates ready comparisons between the informationcontained in the graphs. Thus, the same raw data is used to generatemultiple graphs each directed to a different material characteristic forsubstantially simultaneous display. Preferably, the formatted outputs orgraphs are all displayed on a single screen. This facilitates visualcomparisons between the information displayed in the graphs of thedifferent characteristics on the tested part material.

Thus, in the present method and system several different graphs willappear on one screen with each displaying variations in measurements forthe material characteristics they map for the viewer. For example, astress graph will appear adjacent a graph for retained austenite to showhow these material characteristics fluctuate relative to each other. Thegraphs can be aligned with each other such as along an axiscorresponding with the magnitude of the measured characteristic or alongan axis (or axes for 3D graphs) corresponding to the region along thepart that is tested. This allows an operator to easily make visualcomparisons between the measured characteristics to determine where, forinstance, potential or actual trouble spots exist in the tested regionof the part.

In another aspect, the information provided in the graphs of the partmaterial characteristics can be utilized to develop an evaluation guideor guides that coordinate or correlate the measurements relative to eachother to inform an action that is to be taken on the part, such as forquality control or part maintenance purposes. The evaluation guideitself, when correlative of different measured part characteristics, canbe graphed to allow an operator to see how close or far from thethreshold for action the correlated measurements are. In this manner, anoperator can primarily refer to the guide until the threshold isapproached. At that, and with the proper notification, the operator canthen check the material characteristic graphs that represent thecharacteristics on which the evaluation guide is based. This canindicate to the operator why the threshold for the guide is beingapproached providing the operator a useful evaluative tool to gaininformation regarding the condition of tested part material.

As has been mentioned, pursuant to the present invention and system,graphical information indicative of a plurality of materialcharacteristics is displayed for a portion of a part under test. Energyis directed at the selected portion of the part under test. Resultantenergy is detected from the selected portion of the part under test anddata representative of each of several different materialcharacteristics for the portion of the part under test is obtainedbased, at least in part, upon the detected energy. Different graphs canbe simultaneously formed based upon the obtained data. Each of thegraphs includes information indicative of a separate one of the materialcharacteristics. The graphs are displayed discrete from each other in amanner that facilitates substantially simultaneous visual comparisonsbetween the information contained in each of the graphs. To this end, itis preferred that the graphs all appear on a single screen such asaligned along a z-axis, which is the axis used to measure the magnitudeof the tested characteristic, e.g. stress or retained austenite levelsin part material.

The present condition of a given part under test cannot always beadequately determined by current systems, which examine only a singlecharacteristic such as any of those noted above. Instead, a testoperator will typically wish or otherwise have need to access aplurality of different characteristics for a given part under test. Incurrent systems, a three-dimensional graph indicating stress values maybe displayed. An operator desiring to view multiple characteristics,however, must alternate generating and then viewing the different graphsof the different characteristics. In other words, an operator has toview a screen showing one graph, and then replace the graph with anothergraph that is generated then displayed on the screen, thereby having torecall what they previously viewed. This display and comparisontechnique is cumbersome and time consuming to accomplish and comparisonsbetween different characteristics are often difficult or impossible tomake.

Accordingly, multiple graphs of multiple material characteristics for apart under test may be displayed in a manner that facilitatescomparisons between the different material characteristics. The graphsare preferably displayed on a single screen are aligned along a commonaxis. Aligning along a common axis, for example, the z-axis, allows aviewer to easily compare the characteristics of two or more materialcharacteristics. Within the region tested, the viewer can easilydetermine if one of the material characteristics has suspicious values,and readily compare that graph to the graphs relating to othercharacteristics to see if the values of the other materialcharacteristics also have suspect values in the tested region, forinstance.

To further facilitate comparisons, the viewer can vary the scale of thez-axis in the three-dimensional graphs thereby customizing theresolution of the displayed characteristics. Fine tuning the resolutionfor each of the graphs independent of the others is advantageous since ascale that adequately displays one characteristic may be unsuitable todisplay another characteristic. Hence, a viewer can readily program thescales to clearly see distinctions in the characteristics and is notconfined to any single, preprogrammed scale for any of the graphs.

The viewer can use other techniques to aid visual comparisons betweenthe graphs. For example, the viewer can change the color of the graphs,overlap graphs, and customize the fill characteristics of the graphs.All of these parameters may be varied so that the visual displayemphasizes distinctions and/or potential trouble areas of the part undertest.

If the viewer needs further aid in determining the viability of a part,they may generate a report for a particular location on the part undertest. In one example, the report indicates the exact measurement valuesof a location on the part under test. Conveniently, the report can begenerated by having the user click on the point on the screencorresponding to the part location where the viewer wants to generatethe report. Reports are particularly useful, because, in some instances,the viewer may not be able to visually discern values on the graph ormay otherwise need to determine more exact values that are readilyvisible.

As has been mentioned previously, pursuant to one aspect of the presentinvention, an evaluation guide or guides is determined. An evaluationguide defines a relationship between two or more materialcharacteristics for the part under test, for instance, between stressand strain. A set of guide values (e.g., (GSTRESS1, GSTRAIN1);(GSTRESS2, GSTRAIN2), etc.) is formed when guide values for a firstmaterial characteristic values are applied to the guide, and theevaluation guide is used to determine the remaining guide valuesassociated with the other material characteristics. In a specificexample, if the guide specifies a linear relationship between stress andstrain (e.g., strain=stress), then the guide values of (1,1); (2,2), andso forth may be determined.

As stated above, raw data is received from sensors as x-ray diffractioninformation. This raw data, including intensity readings for a givendiffraction angles, is used to calculate measurement values, whichspecify the magnitude of a particular material characteristic at aparticular point on the part under test. Preferably, the measurementvalues for multiple characteristics are formed simultaneously orsubstantially simultaneously. In the present example, raw data isreceived and converted into measurement values for stress and strain.

Comparisons may be made between the guide values associated with theguide and the actual measurement values associated with the materialcharacteristics of the guide. Specifically, after an evaluation guideand guide values are determined, test measurement resultants are formedfrom the sets of measurement values for the same materialcharacteristics associated with the evaluation guide. Each testmeasurement resultant includes two or more measurement values relatingto the material characteristics in the evaluation guide at a particularpoint on the part under test. After the test measurement resultants areformed, the test measurement resultants are compared to the guidevalues. In the present example, measurement values for stress (e.g.,(STRESS1, STRESS2, etc.) and strain (STRAIN1, STRAIN2, etc.) are formedinto test measurement resultants (TSTRESS1, TSTRAIN1), (TRSTESS2,TSTRAIN2), and so forth.

Different types of comparisons between the guide values and the testmeasurement resultants may be made. In one approach, the guide valuesmay be plotted on a graph and the test measurement resultants alsoplotted on the same graph. Then, a zone may be defined as an area aboutthe guide values where the test measurement resultants are expected tofall. If the test measurement resultants fall outside of the zone, anaction can be taken by the viewer. Plotting the guide values and thetest measurement resultants offers a convenient and easy way for theoperator to make a determination that the part is potentially defective.

In the present example, after an evaluation guide and guide valuesrelating stress to strain are determined and plotted as a line on agraph, a zone can be defined about the line. Then, the test measurementresultants ((TSTRESS1, TSTRAIN1); (TRSTESS2, TSTRAIN2), etc.) may beplotted on the same graph. A comparison is made to see if the testmeasurement resultants fall within the zone or outside the zone. If atest measurement resultant falls outside of the zone, the operator maymake a determination that further action should be taken.

In other examples of comparisons using an evaluation guide, the guidevalues can define a threshold, which can be compared to the testmeasurement resultants. The guide values may represent a ceiling underwhich all test measurement resultants should be below or a floor overwhich all test measurement resultants should be above. The guide valuescan be graphed and the test measurement resultants plotted against theguide values on the same graph. Easy comparisons between the location ofthe test measurement resultants relative to the guide values can bemade. In the current example, the test measurement resultants (e.g.,(TSTRESS1, TSTRAIN1); (TSTRESS2, TSTRAIN2), etc.) may be plotted andcompared to the guide values (e.g., (GSTRESS1, GSTRAIN1);(GSTRESS2,GSTRAIN2, etc.).

In still another approach, a first threshold value for a materialcharacteristic may be defined. For example, a threshold value of 10 ksimay be determined for stress. Based upon this threshold, a secondthreshold value relating to a second material characteristic may bedetermined based upon a relationship, for example, an equation or set ofequations that relate the material characteristics. For instance, ifstress and strain are related by a linear relationship (e.g.,strain=stress), then the second threshold for strain would also be 10ksi.

After the thresholds are determined, selected measurement values for theselected characteristics (e.g., stress and strain) are monitored in realtime as the measurement values are calculated from the raw data. Theycan be monitored at a particular point or points on the part under test.In one example, if the measurement values exceed one or more of thethresholds, the operator may be alerted and an action may be taken bythe operator. In another example, the measurement values are monitoredand when these values approach to within a certain limit of any or allof the thresholds, the operator is alerted and an action may be taken.This approach offers a convenient and automatic way for thresholds andlimits to be set by an operator and defective parts detected.Advantageously, the operator does not have to constantly examine thegraphs to determine if a threshold is exceeded or manually calculatemultiple threshold values.

In another preferred embodiment, a system is provided for displayinggraphical information indicative of different material characteristicsfor a portion of a part under test. The system includes an energyemitter. The emitter directs energy at a selected portion of a partunder test. The system also includes an energy detector that detectsresultant energy from the selected portion of the part under test. Thedetected energy is transmitted to a controller either already processedinto measurement data or for processing it into data for the differentmaterial characteristics being tested. The data can be stored in memory.The controller is coupled to the memory and includes an output coupledto the display for generating graphs of the measurements for each of thetested material characteristics of the part.

Preferably, the controller generates the graphs on a single screen inorder to facilitate visual comparisons between the measured materialcharacteristics. For example, the visual comparisons can determine wheremeasurements are relatively high or low as compared to othermeasurements relating to characteristics of the part material. If thisdetermination is made, the user make take further appropriate action asmay be deemed necessary. In another form, the controller may generate anevaluation guide based upon a predetermined relationship between atleast two of the measured material characteristics. As previouslymentioned, the controller may graph the guide values and plot testmeasurement resultants against the guide. A zone may then be identifiedabout the guide to define a region about the guide where testmeasurement resultants may fall and still be deemed acceptable. Theviewer can then visually determine whether the test measurementresultants fall within the zone, above the evaluation guide, or belowthe evaluation guide. In other words, the viewer can visibly determinewhether deviations of the measurement values represented in the testmeasurement resultant from the evaluation guide are acceptable basedupon whether the test measurement resultants fall within or out of thezone.

Based upon the visual review of the graphs, the operator may takeactions. By displaying the graphs of material characteristics on asingle screen, potential problems of a part under test can be easilydetected and corrective action taken before the part fails, forinstance. This can be extremely important in applications such asaircraft engines where a failure can cause catastrophic results. Theoperator may pull the part to be tested, perform further tests on thepart, alert others that the part is suspicious, and record the identityof the part for future reference.

The evaluation guide is also beneficial because a viewer can easilydetermine how test measurement resultants compare against the evaluationguide. Again, this determination can easily be made and correctiveaction quickly taken before the part under test fails. In this regard,and as has been discussed above, the operator can view the evaluationguide in graphical form and compare the guide to test measurementresultants as the measurement values are taken. If the comparisonbetween the guide and the values indicates nonconformance, then theoperator can take appropriate action.

The embodiments are useful to effect various economical, reliable,relatively intuitive, and relatively scalable solutions to at least someof the various concerns and issues noted herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for displaying graphicalinformation by directing x-rays to a part under test in accordance witha preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is flowchart of a method for displaying graphical information toa user in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for selecting graphical displayparameters in accordance with the method of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart for selecting additional display parameters inaccordance with the method of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart for monitoring threshold values of a coordinateand taking an action in accordance with the method of FIGS. 2-4;

FIG. 6 is a flow chart for monitoring patterns of values defined by anevaluation guide in accordance with another preferred method of thepresent invention;

FIG. 7 is a view of a single screen display of the system of FIG. 1showing stress, shear stress intensity ratio and average peak FWHMaligned along a common axis;

FIG. 8 is another single screen display showing stress, shear stress,intensity ratio and average peak FWHM aligned along a common axis alongwith a report of characteristics at a point of the part under test;

FIG. 9 is a single screen display showing two and three dimensionalgraphs of tested material characteristics;

FIG. 10 is a single screen display showing two and three dimensionalgraphs of tested material characteristics and a report based thereon;

FIG. 11 is a single screen display of graphs showing stress, error,intensity ratio and average peak breath aligned along a common axis;

FIG. 12 is a single screen display of graphs showing different materialcharacteristics along a common axis, isobar graphs and two dimensionalgraphs;

FIG. 13 is a perspective view of an energy diffraction apparatus forx-ray diffraction testing of parts; and

FIG. 14 is a graph of an evaluation guide and plotted measurementvalues.

Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures areillustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily beendrawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements inthe figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help toimprove understanding of various embodiments of the present invention.Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessaryin a commercially feasible embodiment are typically not depicted inorder to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodimentsof the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring initially to FIG. 1, a system 100 for graphically displayingenergy measurement information for a part under test 110 preferablyincludes a controller 102, a memory 104, a measurement system 106 and adisplay system 108. The controller 102 is communicatively coupled to thememory 104, the measurement system 106, and the display system 108. Themeasurement system 106 preferably includes an energy emitter 122, energydetectors 120 a and 120 b, and a control module 124. As will beexplained in greater detail below, the emitter 122, under the control ofthe control module 124, directs energy to the part under test 110, andthe detectors 120 a and 120 b detect resultant energy from the partunder test 110. The directed energy may include any form of energy, forinstance, x-rays or thermal energy. The resultant energy detected by thedetectors 120 a and 120 b may be diffracted energy or attenuated energy.Other forms of directed and resultant energy are possible. In accordancewith the preferred form of the invention, raw data is obtained from thedetected energy which is then used as the common data to generateseveral measurements each of a different material characteristic of thepart, e.g., stress, retained austenite, and grain size, as will bedescribed further hereinafter.

The part under test 110 is often a component of a high-performancesystem where a failure of the part may result in tragic consequences.For example, the part under test 110 may be an aircraft engine componentwhere a failure of the component may result in the loss of the engineand aircraft. Thus, it is important to be able to determine thereliability of parts in the system and, specifically, to determine theunreliability of a part before the part actually fails.

Most often, the determination of the reliability of the part under test110 is made based upon measuring multiple material characteristics ofthe part under test 110. For example, the stress in a particular pointmay be measured as well as the retained austenite value for that point.Particular values of stress together with particular values of retainedaustenite may indicate the unreliability of the part under test 110.However, with current systems the information regarding one particularpart material characteristic is only generated at any one time anddisplayed on a screen. In other words, if the operator needs to comparetwo or more material characteristics of the part under test 110, theywould have to view the information on separate video terminals.Alternatively, the operator must remember the information concerning thefirst material characteristic and then generate the information for asecond material characteristic for display on the screen showing onlythis information concerning the second material characteristic in anattempt to make a comparison between the two material characteristics.Obviously, both approaches are cumbersome and inconvenient for theoperator.

In the present system, information regarding several tested materialcharacteristics of the part under test 110 can be displayed on the samescreen 108 a of the display system 108. Specifically, an operator canview the screen 108 a and simultaneously have generated and displayed tothem measurement information regarding several different materialcharacteristics for the part under test 110. The simultaneous display ofthe information on a single screen 108 a allows the operator to readilycheck measurements for different material characteristics without havingto take further intervention or needing additional computer hardwaresuch as another screen or the like for this purpose. In addition, thesame data can be used to develop the displayed graphs so that additionaltesting need not take place for comparison purposes. Preferably, theinformation in the graphs is arranged in a manner that leads an operatorto make easy comparisons between the information such as by aligning thegraphs along the z-axis as will be described further hereafter.

Based upon viewing the characteristics together, the operator canvisually determine that some values are high relative to other valuesand some values are low relative to other values. The high and lowvalues may exceed acceptable limits for the material characteristic.Since the graphs are displayed together, the operator can make fast andeasy comparisons of the material characteristics to determine, basedupon all or some of the characteristics displayed, and determine whetheran action needs to be taken regarding the part under test 110.

In one example, and referencing FIG. 11, graphs 1101, 1103, 1104, and1105 showing the stress, error, intensity ratio, and peak breath aredisplayed on top of each other along the z-axis on the single screen 108a. An examination of the stress graph 1101 indicates that stress reachesa maximum value in an area 1102. As can also be seen, the values of theother material characteristics vary over the tested area of the partunder test 110 and also within the corresponding area 1102 in theirgraphs. This may indicate that the part under test 110 may be defectiverequiring that further action concerning the part under test 110 shouldbe taken.

The operator, after viewing the graphs on the screen 108 a, may take anaction as a result of the viewing. For instance, if the operator viewsthe graphs and recognizes that the combination of displayedcharacteristics represents a problematic location on the part, then thepart can be pulled. In another example, if the viewing indicates thatthe part may have problems, further testing may be performed on thepart. As is apparent, the operator can conveniently make thisdetermination after viewing the graphs on a single screen. In theexample of FIG. 11, the viewer may notice that stress reaches anextremely high value in the area 1102 on the graph 1101 and pull thispart for further testing. On the other hand, the fact that none of thegraphs 1103-1105 show a similar concentration of high values mayindicate that the point is still within safe and tolerable levels forthe various characteristics tested.

Besides graphs, reports and other types of information may be displayedon the single screen 108 a. Specifically, a report indicating additionalinformation concerning a point or location on the part under test may begenerated and displayed alongside the graphs. The report indicates exactvalue measurements for a specific point. For example, a report for apoint may indicate stress, shear stress, and retain austenite values forthe point in question. Displaying a report is useful in many situationsbecause a user may want to see exact measurement values or otherinformation about a measured point in a discrete format alongside thevisual format of the graphs. In some instances, the graphs may bedifficult to read and in other instances, the viewer may need to know anexact value, for instance, if the measurement value on the correspondinggraph appears to border on being unacceptable.

Referring now to FIG. 10, a report 1002 is shown alongside a graph 1004.The report 1004 shows the measured stress, intensity ratio, average peakbreath, and average peak FWHM for a particular point on the part undertest 110 as measured from two detectors. Also, the stress for theselected point is −81.336 ksi. In one example of use of this report, theoperator may know that values of stress less than −81 ksi indicate thatthe part needs to be pulled. However, looking at the graph 1004, it isdifficult to determine if this threshold has been exceeded. However, byclicking on the point to be examined using a computer mouse, the report1002 is generated and the operator can readily see the stress value,determine the value exceeds the threshold, and pull the part under test110 for further testing.

Another benefit of the present system is that an evaluation guide orguides may be determined. The evaluation guide may be determined by theoperator to indicate a relationship between two or more materialcharacteristics. Based upon the evaluation guides, guide values may becalculated and displayed upon the single screen 108 a. In addition, testmeasurement resultants may be determined. The test measurementresultants include two or more measurement values for a particular pointon the part under test for the same material characteristics defined inthe guide. For instance, if the guide relates stress to strain, testmeasurement resultants are formed from measurement values of stress andstrain with each test measurement relating to a point on the part undertest.

Since the test measurement resultants include measurement valuesassociated with the same material characteristics of the guide, the testmeasurement resultants can be plotted on the same graph as the guidevalues and compared to the guide values. In addition, the guide valuesand test measurement resultants may be displayed alone on the singlescreen 108 a or together with the graphs of the material characteristicsof the part under test 110.

In one example of the use of the evaluation guide, and referring nowalso to FIG. 14, guide values for an evaluation guide are plotted as theguide line 1402. As can be seen, the relationship indicated by the guidevalues of the guide line 1402 is linear. In this case, the relationshipdefined by the guide line 1402 is a target value that relates how thetwo material characteristics should ideally compare. A zone 1404 is alsoidentified about the line 1402 that defines an acceptable extent ofdeviation from the guide line 1402.

Test measurement resultants 1406 a-d, 1408 a-b, and 1410 a-b are formedfrom the measurement values relating to the particular materialcharacteristics of the evaluation guide and are plotted. An operator canview the graph and see that the group of plotted test measurementresultants 1406 a-d fall within the zone 1404, indicating that themeasurement values represented by these test measurement resultants 1406a-d are acceptable. However, the test measurement resultants 1408 a-band 1410 a-b do not fall within the zone 1404, indicating that for somepoints on the part under test 110, the measurement values are notacceptable. Once the operator sees that a test measurement resultantfalls outside of the zone 1401, the operator may take an action, forexample, removing the part under test for further testing or investigatewhich of the material characteristics is suspect. Thus, the evaluationguide offers an alternate and convenient way to determine whethermeasurement values fall within acceptable limits.

Alternatively, the evaluation guide may be used as a threshold. In thecase of the evaluation guide depicted in FIG. 14, the guide line 1402could represent a threshold. This threshold may be a ceiling in whichall measurement values were not to exceed or a floor that measurementvalues were not to fall below. If the guide line 1402 were an upperthreshold, then it can be seen that the test measurement resultants 1408a-b a, 1406 a, 1406 c, and 1406 d fall above the threshold. Conversely,if the guide line 1402 represented a floor, then it can be seen that themeasurement values in the test measurement resultant 1410 a-b and 1406 bfall below the guide line 1402. In either case, a viewer can readilydetermine if the threshold is exceeded and determine whether an actionneed be taken since, by exceeding a threshold, it is indicated that somemeasurement values are non-conforming.

In another approach, the viewer may determine that any test measurementresultant that exceeds the threshold is still close enough to the guideline 1402 that no action need be taken. In this regard, the zone 1404may be used as a visual aid to make this determination. Specifically,test measurement resultants that exceed the threshold but fall withinthe zone would still be considered acceptable. Alternatively, the viewermay determine that all test measurement resultants that are that beyondthe threshold require an action to be taken. Thus, the user can readilydetermine if measurement values associated with the test measurementresultants meet a threshold so that an appropriate action may be taken.

The system may also keep track of how the test measurement resultantsrelate to the evaluation guide. In one example, the system may determinewhen the test measurement resultant approaches within a certain distanceof the evaluation guide in order to issue an alert when this occurs. Inanother example, the system may determine when the test measurementresultants leave the zone 1404 and alert the operator when this occurs.

The controller 102 may be any processor that is capable of executingcomputer instructions stored in a memory. For example, the controller102 may be a microprocessor or the like. As shown in FIG. 1, thecontroller 102 and the control module 124 within the measurement system106 may be separate devices. However, the controller 102 and the controlmodule 124 may also be included within the same device, for example,within the same microprocessor. In addition, the controller 102, memory104, and display system 108 may be included within the same systemcomponent or housing, for instance, within a personal computer orcontained on the same control board.

The controller 102 may receive raw data from the measurement system 106and store the data in the memory 104. The data may be stored in anappropriate format and with other information, for example, headers,sufficient to identify the data and allow the information to beretrieved from the memory 104 by the controller 102. The controller 102may also receive and store the evaluation guides in the memory 104.

The controller 102 simultaneously determines the materialcharacteristics from the diffraction data received. Specifically, thecontroller 102 receives data indicating the intensity of the receivedenergy for various diffraction angles. The controller 102 processes thisdata using various mathematical or calculus operations to obtain themeasurement values for material characteristics. These operations can beperformed substantially simultaneously by the programmed software of thecontroller 102 from a user perspective, although system resources maydictate that sequential rather than parallel processing of thealgorithms occur. In one example of the operations the controller 102performs, the controller 102 relates the intensities of the receivedenergy to the corresponding diffraction angles and, from thisrelationship, determines the peak width. The controller 102 then usesthe peak width to calculate the density, hardness, and grain size. Inanother example, the controller 102 determines the absolute peak valuefor the intensity of the received energy and uses the peak value tocalculate strain.

The controller 102 may also, for example, extract previously processedinformation from the memory 104 as requested by an operator at thedisplay system 108 and process this information into a format thatallows the information to be displayed via the display system 108 to theoperator. For example, an operator at the display system 108 may requirethat a preexisting graph be retrieved from the memory 104 and displayedat the display system 108.

The controller 102 may also display the data on the display system inreal time, as the data is received from the measurement system 106. Anoperator at the display system space may additionally request thatspecific types of measurements be made of the part under test 110. Theoperator can also request that certain numbers, types, and graphicalformats of information be displayed. The controller 102 may receive andprocess other types of requests from the measurement system, as well.

The memory 104 may be any type of device that is capable of storinginformation. For example, the memory 104 may be a database where data ofany type is stored. Other examples of memories are possible.

The memory 104 may store the data obtained from the measurement system106. The storage format may follow any number of structures. Forexample, information relating to a particular characteristic of aparticular part under test may be stored in a single document or file.This document or file includes sufficient information for the controller102 to identify and retrieve a particular document or file.

The measurement system 106 may be any type of system that is capable ofdirecting energy at a part under test 110 and detecting resultant energyfrom the part under test 110. As shown in FIG. 1, the measurement system106 preferably includes the energy emitter 122, energy detectors 120 aand 120 b, and the control module 124. The energy emitter 122 may directenergy, for instance, x-rays or thermal energy, onto the part under test110. Resultant energy, for example, diffracted x-rays or attenuatedenergy, may be detected by the sensors 120 a and 120 b.

Although only a single emitter and two sensors are shown, it will beunderstood by those skilled in the art that any number of emitters andsensors may be used. It will also be understood that the measurementsystem 106 may be stationary or it may mobile. In one example, themeasurement system may be of the type described in co-pendingapplication Ser. No. 09/539,346, “X-Ray Diffraction Apparatus andMethod,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,721,393, which is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety. In another example, the measurement systemmay be of the type described in co-pending application Ser. No.10/390,479 “X-ray Diffraction System and Method,” now U.S. Pat. No.6,925,146, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The control module 124 within the measurement system 106 may control themovement and operation of the sensors 120 a and 120 b as well as theemitter 122. Specifically, the control module may move measurementsystem 106 across the part under test 110 in order to take measurements.In one example, this movement may be along the path of an arc. Thecontrol module 124 may also receive the information obtained at thesensors and forward the information to the controller 102 or the memory104.

As previously discussed, the display system 108 is a video displaysystem comprised of a single video screen 108 a. The display system 108allows an operator to request and display information stored in thememory 104 or initiate the measurement and display of information usingthe measurement system 106.

In one example of the operation of the system of FIG. 1, energy, forexample, x-rays, may be directed from the emitter 122 of the measurementsystem 106 onto a portion of the part of under test 110. An operator mayselect the portion of the part of under test 110 where the energy is tobe directed. The measurement system 106 may be move across the partunder test 110, for instance, in an arc, to allow measurements to occurat various points in the path. The sensors 120 a and 120 b of themeasurement system 106 detect the resultant energy, for example,diffracted x-rays or attenuated energy, from the part under test 110 andconvert it into data in a format and form suitable for use by thecontroller 124. This data is forwarded to the controller 124, which thensends it to the controller 102. The controller 102 formats the raw dataand places it into the memory 104. For example, the data may beidentified in the memory 104 by its source, the identity of the partunder test, or the location of the region of the part that was bombardedby the energy.

As previously described, the raw diffraction data received by thecontroller 102 may be analyzed according to various mathematical orcalculus operations to simultaneously determine the materialcharacteristics. The analysis is made by analyzing aspects of therelationship between the intensity of the received energy to thediffraction angle of the received energy. This information may also bedisplayed to an operator. For instance, the graphs 1006 and 1007 shownin FIG. 10 display the intensity of the received energy versusdiffraction angle of the received energy as received at two sensors. Theoperator may use these graphs to visually determine whether the receivedinformation is the same or similar at both sensors. If graphs areradically different, it may indicate that a problem exists with the partunder test or the sensors.

The display system 108 displays the graphs on a single screen 108 a. Thegraphs may be aligned along a common z-axis, as shown, for example, inFIG. 11. Aligning the graphs along the common z-axis is beneficialbecause it allows the operator to make easy visual comparisons formeasurement values for a particular area of the part under test 110.Further, the operator does not have to switch back and forth betweenviewing the graphs of different material characteristics and does nothave to obtain two video terminals to view the graphs simultaneously.Instead, the viewer merely needs to examine the graphs as they aresimultaneously displayed on the screen 108 a. Thus, the view can makeready comparisons and determine if and when further action regarding thepart under test needs to be taken.

In addition, the display system 108 may graphically depict evaluationguides and graph sets of measurement values against these guides, forexample, as shown in FIG. 14. If the evaluation guide represents atarget value, the viewer can determine whether the measurement valuesfall within an acceptable range of the guide. If the evaluation guiderepresents a threshold, then the viewer can determine whether themeasurement values fall above or below the threshold. Once thisdetermination is made, the viewer can determine whether or not to takeany further action.

Conveniently, the operator may change the parameters for the display ofthe graphs on the screen 108 a to make the viewing of the graphs easier.For instance, in order that the material characteristic may be displayedto show distinctions and differences in the measured values, theresolution (affecting the z-axis of the graph) may be modified.

In another example, the color of the graphs may be varied so thatcertain graphs or portions of graphs are prominent. This is useful insituations where some material characteristics are more important thanother. The operator also can customize the resolution and dimensions ofeach graph. Detailed reports concerning the characteristics of aparticular point on a graph may be generated, for example, by theoperator selecting and clicking on a point on the graph using a computermouse or other cursor control device.

To aid in distinguishing variations in the graphs and generallypresenting the graphs in a visually pleasing format, various differentdisplay techniques may be employed. For instance, the three-dimensionalgraphs can be color-coded, with particular measurement ranges having aspecific color. These colors may be customized for each graph by theoperator. The three-dimensional graphs can also be filled with any typeof graphical filling, for example, wire-frame, filled surface, orpoints. Further, an isobar projection of each graph may be created anddisplayed. Two-dimensional sectional planes can also be created andpositioned within the three-dimensional graphs. The two-dimensionalplanes can be separately displayed as two-dimensional graphs. Inaddition, the operator may click and drag any section plane todynamically update the two-dimensional graph corresponding to thesection plane. Further, graphs can be overlapped with each other withdifferent graphs having different colors.

Measurements may be made and graphs derived of the characteristics onthe surface of the part under test 110. Alternatively, measurements maybe made and graphs derived of the characteristics for points or areasunderneath the surface of the part under test 110. In this case, theoperator may select the location of the point or area. Further,measurements may be made and graphs derived for multiple points and/orlocations. At the display system 108, graphs showing the characteristicsmay be shown along with graphs showing the characteristics at aparticular depth or at a variety of depths.

Conveniently, the operator may also choose to display and/or monitorsome or all of the graphs in real-time and take appropriate actions whenthresholds are reached in the graphs. In addition, the display systemmay graph the evaluation guides and determine whether measurement valuesfall within certain distances of the evaluation guides. For instance,and referring again to FIG. 14, the display system may determine how farthe test measurement resultants 1406 a-d, 1408 a-b, and 1410 a-b arefrom the line 1402 or whether these resultants fall within the zone1404. Based upon this determination, the system may alert an operator totake appropriate action.

Referring now to FIG. 2, one example of a corresponding method isdescribed. At step 202, it may be determined whether it is desired toopen an existing graph that already is stored in a memory. For example,a previously-generated graph may be stored in memory, and the operatormay wish to view the graph to review the material characteristicindicated in the graph. As is known in the art, the graph may be storedin a computer file or similar arrangement. If the answer at step 202 isnegative, then execution continues at step 204. If the answer at step202 is affirmative, then execution continues at step 212.

At step 204, the operator can select parameters for the graph that theoperator wishes to display. As will be explained in greater detail withrespect to FIG. 3, this selection may include the type of graph todisplay, the size of the graph, and the resolution of the graph.

This step may include the acquisition of data for relating to thesurface contours (the z-position of the portion of the part under test)for the portion of the part under test. In other words, a graph ormapping that depicts the shape or configurations of the region orportion of the surface of the part under test may be undertaken.Obtaining data indicating the z-position coordinates of the surface ofthe part under test may be desirable so that, for example, an energyemitter and/or sensor may be moved to a precise position above the partunder test to properly focus directed energy at the part under test whenmeasurements are conducted. One example of a method used to accomplishthis mapping is described in copending application Ser. No. 09/539,346,“X-Ray Diffraction Apparatus and Method,” which has been incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety.

At step 206, data may be collected, for example, via the measurementsystem 106 in FIG. 1. In the example system of FIG. 1, the data may betransmitted from the measurement system 106 and stored in the memory 104by the controller 102.

At step 208, the operator may select the parameters of the display. Aswill be discussed more fully with respect to FIG. 4, this may includedetermining the number of graphs to display, the layout of the graphs,the filling of the graphs, and the selection of particular areas ofinterest within the graphs to view.

At step 210, the graph can be displayed. For example, the graph may bedisplayed according to the graph parameters selected at step 204 and inaccordance with the display parameters selected at step 208. The graphmay be displayed on a video terminal or the like. The graph may bedisplayed using other display media, as well.

Suitable processing techniques such as of the Single Exposure Technique(SET), Linear technique, elliptical technique, or triaxial technique,may be used to process the data for each point of the graph into anintermediate form. Then, the intermediate form can be converted into agraph for display on the screen. The software may also establish reportsand other types of information to be displayed on the screen using. Forexample, and now referring to FIG. 10, a report 1002 may be generatedshowing the measured stress, intensity ratio, average peak breath, andaverage peak FWHM for a particular point on the part under test 110 asmeasured from two detectors with all this information obtained from thesame raw data.

The graph may also be an existing graph stored in a memory. In thissituation, an operator may specify the identity of the graph to thecontroller, and, using this information, the controller may locate thegraph in memory, retrieve the graph, and display the graph on a displaysystem. Alternatively, if the graph is to be displayed in real-time, acontroller may process the data into a graphical format and display thegraph directly on the screen to an operator without first having tostore the graph in memory. Periodic updates of the graph may also bemade (for example, on an automatic basis or when initiated by anoperator).

At step 212, it may be determined whether the operator wishes to view anexisting graph quickly without, for example, having to set displayparameters. If the answer is affirmative, then execution continues atstep 210. If the answer is negative, then execution continues at step208.

Referring now to FIG. 3, one example of a corresponding method toaccomplish the above-mentioned steps is described. At step 302, acoordinate system is selected by an operator. The operator may chooseany number of coordinate systems to display the information. Forexample, the operator may choose a circular coordinate system to displaygraphs, where the coordinates are mapped according to radius and angle.The operator may also choose the polar map coordinate system, thethree-dimensional coordinate system (where the coordinates are given interms of the x, y, and z positions), or the annular coordinate system(where data is graphed into rings). The operator may also choose to mapthe physical contours of the portion of the part under test. Theoperation of this mode is described in copending application Ser. No.09/539,346, “X-Ray Diffraction Apparatus and Method,” which has alreadybeen incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

At step 304, the operator can set parameters related to the display ofthe graph. For example, if the coordinate system being used is thethree-dimensional coordinate system, then the operator may input x and ydimensions for the graph, and x and y resolutions for the graph. Theoperator may also choose to have data displayed on this graph inreal-time. In other words, the operator may have the data displayed tothe user as the data is collected by a measurement system. In anotherexample, the operator may determine an analysis method that is to beused in analyzing the data, for instance, the Single Exposure Technique,the Linear technique, the Elliptical analysis method, or the Triaxialanalysis method.

At step 306, it may be determined if the z-axis profile of the partunder test should be mapped. If the answer is affirmative, at step 308the system acquires data for the z-position coordinates. The values ofthe z coordinates are mapped so that, for example, an energy emitter canproperly focus the energy on the part under test. If the answer isnegative, then execution ends.

Referring now to FIG. 4, one example of a corresponding method toaccomplish the above-mentioned actions is described. At step 402, theoperator may select how many graphs are to be simultaneously displayedon a single screen. Any number of graphs can be displayed such that thegraphs are visually discernable and recognizable by an operator. In oneexample, the operator may chose to display four graphs. When displayed,the graphs may be oriented along a common axis, for example along avertical axis so that the graphs are “stacked” upon each other.

As previously discussed, it is advantageous to stack the graphs on topof each other on a single screen to enhance the ability of the operatorto readily make visual comparisons. For example, they can examine thegraphs and compare the values for a particular region of the part undertest. As stated earlier, by using this approach, there is no need toswitch back and forth between different computer screens and no need tomaintain two terminals in order to make visual comparisons.

Alternatively, the graphs may be overlapped. In other words, instead ofstacking the graphs one on top of each other, the graphs may bedisplayed together on the same x-axis and y-axis. In this case, two ormore graphs can be displayed using different colors. In still anotherexample, the graphs may be displayed so that they are horizontallyaligned along their respective x-axes.

At step 404, the operator may select an analysis mode. In one example,the operator may choose to analyze the actual data collected. In anotherexample, the operator may choose to analyze previously collected datausing map algebra. For example, values contained in a second map may besubtracted from the values contained in a first map creating a third,“difference” map. Other options for the analysis mode are possible.

In another approach, a user can retrieve a graph from memory relating toa particular material characteristic. A second graph showing the samematerial characteristic, either related to a current set of measurementsor generated during a second time period, can also be displayed. Thefirst and second graphs may relate to the same or different parts undertest. The user can drag the first graph and drop it on the second graph,and then click their computer mouse to generate a third graph, whichillustrates the differences between the first and second graphs. Byusing this approach, the viewer can readily determine how a particularmaterial characteristic has changed over time between parts or on thesame part.

At step 406, the operator may select the material characteristics to bedisplayed in a graphical format. The characteristics to be displayed tothe operator may be selected as a group (i.e., as a set) orindividually. In one example, the operator may select source data typesbased upon a measurement method (e.g., linear, elliptical, or triaxial).In another example, the operator may select characteristicsindividually. Examples of characteristics include but are not limited tostress, stress error, intensity ratio, average peak breadth, averagefull width at half maximum (FWHM), shear stress, stress tensor, errortensor, x-direction stress, y-direction stress, maximum shear,equivalent stress, hardness, grain size, dislocation density, plasticstrain, percent plastic strain, percent cold work, phases, percentretained austenite, strain, strain error, shear strain, strain tensor,x-direction strain, y-direction strain, and maximum strain to name afew. The characteristics may be determined at the surface of the partunder test or at particular depths underneath the surface of the partunder test. In addition, the characteristics may be derived from thedetected diffracted or attenuated energy. As is apparent from theforgoing, a broad range of characteristics and selection methods arepossible with the present system and method.

At step 408, the operator may select the layout of the display. Theoperator may determine the positions on the screen where graphs andother information is to be displayed. For instance, the operator mayindicate the exact screen coordinates where each graph is to bedisplayed on the screen. This may be accomplished by clicking anddragging the graphs with a computer mouse or some other selectionmethod. Custom setting is advantageous because it allows the operator toalter the display from predetermined setting based upon actualmeasurements. In addition, it allows the operator to determine thedisplay and location of graphs that are truly useful in evaluating thepart under test.

The operator may also choose to display the graphs according topredetermined positioning patterns. For instance, the operator maydecide to display three-dimensional graphs along the left side of thescreen along a common vertical axis and two-dimensional graphs along theright side of the screen. This is advantageous whenever the operatorneeds to quickly display the graphs without having to take the time tocustom program each graph location.

The operator may additionally select a convenient layout method tofacilitate the comparison of information included in the graphs. Forinstance, the operator may “stack” graphs by aligning multiple graphsalong a common vertical axis. In another example, graphs may be alignedhorizontally along a common horizontal axis. The operator may do thisusing a programming tool to determine a common axis and move the graphsto this common axis. For instance, the operator may use a computer mouseto drag and drop the graphs along the axis or alternatively specify anx, y coordinate to align the graphs. Other alignments and positioningpatterns are possible. As has been discussed previously, the alignmentpattern aids the viewer in evaluating the graphs of the materialcharacteristics.

The operator may also display an analysis report for a single point on agraph. For instance, the operator may move a cursor to a point or areaon a graph and click on the point causing a report to be generated anddisplayed concerning that point. In one example, the report includesstress-related information obtained from diffracted energy at twosensors. Other examples of reports are possible.

Once the graphs have been displayed, the operator may also move graphson the display. For example, the operator may use a cursor control tomove any graph to a new position to facilitate additional comparisonsbetween graphs. Other examples and methods for determining and adjustingthe layout of the screen are possible.

Conveniently, if the resolutions and scales of each of the graphs arethe same or similar and the graphs are aligned, then easy comparisonsmay be made between different material characteristics of portion of thepart under test. This aids viewing since an area of the same size willbe presented to the user for each of the graphs. In other words, theuser does not have to struggle to see small areas and compare the areasto other larger areas for other material characteristics if the samescale is chosen for the x and y axes.

In addition, the scale and resolution of the z-axis may also be adjustedfor each of the graphs. The graphs for each of the materialcharacteristics may have different ranges for the measured values of thecharacteristic and the ranges can be preferably adjusted by the operatorso that the operator can easily discern variations in the measurementvalues for the characteristic. For example, and now also referring toFIG. 7, it can be seen that scale for the graph showing stress variesfrom approximately 27 to −90 ksi; the graph showing shear stress variesfrom approximately 17 to −10 ksi; the graph showing intensity ratiovaries from 1.8 to 1.0 ksi; and the average peak FWHM varies from 3.8 to2.1 ksi. By varying the resolutions, the operator can easily variationsin the measurements and make meaningful comparisons between the graphs.

At step 410, the operator may select viewing parameters such asrotation, translation, zoom, resolutions for the x, y and z axes;tensile compression; and spectrum (color gradient). At step 412, theoperator may select the map surface fill for three-dimensional maps. Forexample, as is known in the art, the operator may select points fill,wire frame, or surface fill as the surface fill type. Manifestly, otherexamples of viewing parameters and surface fill types are possible.

At step 414, the operator can inspect characteristic values as afunction of dimensional coordinate. For example, the operator maydisplay the characteristic as a new graph and as a function of positionalong the x, y, or z axis. In another example, the operator may alsocreate an isobar projection of the graph to display.

At step 416, the operator may select filters, which adjust the contentand/or layout of the graphs on the display. For example, the operatormay remove a region from a graph being displayed because the data fromthe region is suspect or unreliable. As is described in greater detailelsewhere in this application, the operator may also set measurementthresholds whereby predefined actions occur when these thresholds arereached. In addition, as will also be described in greater in thisapplication, the operator may have the system monitor the graphs forcertain evaluation guides and may have the system perform certainactions when these guides have been detected. The evaluation guides 1402themselves may be the subject of graphs (see FIG. 14), such as whenthere is a correlation between values of the different measured materialcharacteristics and the threshold for action as determined by such aguide.

Referring now to FIG. 5, one example of a method corresponding to theabove-mention actions is described. At step 502, the monitor option formonitor mode may be selected for a graph by an operator. This selectionallows data to be displayed in the graph in real-time, as the data ismeasured and collected. Periodic updates may also occur.

At step 504, the operator may determine the coordinates within the graphthat are to be monitored. In one example, an area (multiple points) ofthe graph is monitored. In another example, a single coordinate withinthe graph is selected. The operator may then set predetermined thresholdvalues that are to be monitored for the selected points for certainmaterial characteristics. The threshold values may be related, forinstance, by a mathematical relationship.

At step 506, the system may monitor the area or point of the graph. Asis known in the art, any combination of electronic hardware or computersoftware may be used to accomplish this result.

At step 508, the system can determine whether a threshold has beenreached. If the answer is affirmative, then execution continues at step512. If the answer is negative, then execution continues at step 510.The system may determine whether some or all of the thresholds have beenreached at the selected points.

At step 510, the system may determine if the operator wishes to cancelthe monitoring. If the answer is affirmative, execution ends. If theanswer is negative, control returns to step 506.

At step 512, an action can be taken. For example, the system may alertthe operator by raising a flag or alarm on a video screen. In anotherexample, the system may send a communication, for instance, an e-mail ora wireless message, to the operator or others. The content of anycommunication may be used to alert the operator that a part havingsuspicious characteristics has been detected. This may necessitatefurther action by the operator. For instance, it may mean removing thepart or testing the part again, for different material characteristics.Other actions are possible.

Referring now to FIG. 6, one example of a corresponding method formonitoring the graphs for evaluation guides is described. At step 602,the monitor option for monitor mode may be selected for the graph by theoperator. This selection allows the graph to be displayed to theoperator in real-time, as the data is measured and collected.

At step 604, the operator can determine a coordinate to be monitoredwithin a graph. In another example, an area of the graph is selected tobe monitored.

At step 606, the operator may determine an evaluation guide. Theevaluation guide may include any set of guide values relating to atleast one material characteristic. As between evaluation guides, theguide values may be related by a known relationship, unrelated, ordetermined by testing. In addition, the guide values contained within anevaluation guide may be predetermined or determined by the operator asneeded. Further, the guide values associated with an evaluation guidemay be fixed, or an operator may change the values in the guides overtime such as based on the empirical data gathered on parts via a testingsystem as described herein.

In one example, an evaluation guide may be selected having a stressvalue of S1 and a retained austenite value of A1. The operator may alsoindicate that a first action is to taken, if these guide values aredetected. In another example, the operator may determine guide values ofstress of S2 and a retained austenite of A1. The operator may alsoindicate that a second action be taken when the values in thisevaluation guide are detected.

At step 608, the system can monitor the area of the graph in an attemptto obtain a match with the guide values. As is known in the art, acombination of electronic hardware or computer software may be used toaccomplish this result.

At step 610, the system may determine whether the guide values have beendetected. If the answer is affirmative, then execution continues at step614. If the answer is negative, then execution continues at step 612.

At step 612, the system can determine if the operator wishes to cancelthe monitoring. If the answer is affirmative, execution ends. If theanswer is negative, control returns to step 608.

At step 614, an action may be taken. The action can be defined by theoperator as discussed above with respect to step 606. For example, thesystem may alert the operator by raising a flag or alarm on the screen.In another example, the system may send a communication, for instance,an e-mail to the operator or others. The content of such a communicationmay be used to alert the operator that a part having suspiciouscharacteristics has been detected. This may necessitate further actionby the operator, for instance, removing the part or testing the partagain, for new characteristics. Other actions are possible.

Referring to FIGS. 7-12, there are illustrated examples of displayscreated by the above-mentioned steps. Preferably, these displays may bemade on a single screen 108 a of a video monitor to facilitate ease inthe comparison between the different graphs as has been previouslydescribed. It will be understood that the graphs described herein areonly examples. In other words, the content, type of graphs, features,relationships between graphs, information displayed, type of reports,contents of the reports, analyses, charts, or tables may vary. Inaddition, the locations, color, graphical fill, shading, or any otherfont or stylistic feature may be changed or altered. Finally, the graphsare shown as being in the three-dimensional (x, y, z) coordinate system.However, it will be understood that the graphs can be mapped into anyother coordinate system and that graphs of different coordinate systemscan be displayed together.

Referring now to FIG. 7, one example of a display on a single screen 108a will be described. The display includes four graphs stacked 702, 704,706, and 708 on top of each other on a single screen. To facilitatecomparisons, the four graphs are mapped on the same coordinate system,with the same resolution, and are aligned along a common vertical axis.This allows a viewer to see the magnitude of each of the measuredmaterial characteristics that are graphed at the same location on thetested part by simply scanning substantially vertically up and downalong the screen 108 a. In this example, the operator has chosen todisplay four material characteristics (using the four graphs 702, 704,706, and 708) including stress, shear stress, intensity ratio, andaverage peak FWHM. The graphs 702, 704, 706, and 708 may be color-codedwhere different colors indicate different measurement value ranges. Inone example, a particular shade of red may indicate shear stressesbetween 16.8 and 14.4 ksi, and another shade of red may indicatestresses between 14.4 and 11.5 ksi. A color gradient chart next to eachof the graphs indicates the relationship between color and measurementvalue.

By aligning the graphs 702, 704, 706, and 708 along a common axis, itcan be seen that easy visual comparisons may be made as to the materialcharacteristics displayed. In this case it can be seen that stress isrelatively constant for one portion of the part rising to a uniformhigher value on the other portion of the part under test. It can also beseen that the shear stress is relatively constant over the part exceptfor a peak in one area of the part. Intensity ratio can be seen to varywidely reaching different peaks in different areas of the part undertest. Average peak width FWHM can be seen as relatively constant butdipping in one area of the part under test. If it were a requirementthat both stress and shear stress be high for a particular region beforean action is needed, a viewer could easily determine that thisrequirement is not met and no further action need be taken.

Referring now to FIG. 8, another example of a display will be described.This display includes four graphs 802, 804, 806, and 808, and report810. As with the display of FIG. 7, the display includes four graphsstacked on top of each other. To facilitate comparisons, the four graphs802, 804, 806, and 808 are mapped on the same coordinate system, usingthe same resolution, and are aligned along a common vertical axis. Theoperator has chosen to display four material characteristics includingstress, shear stress, intensity ratio, and average peak FWHM. A colorgradient chart next to the graphs indicates the color and measurementrelationships. The graphs are the same as shown in FIG. 7.

The report 810 may be created when the operator clicks on a particularpoint in a graph. The report 810 can be any series of values relating toa point or set of points selected by the operator. In this example, thereport 810 indicates different values related to diffraction informationreceived at two sensors from the part under test. Some of these valuescan be mapped in two-dimensions in the graph in the center of FIG. 8.

D-spacing is a lattice parameter and relates to the spacing between thecrystal planes of the material while Sin2 psi relates to the diffractionangle of the sensed diffracted energy. The slope of the plotting ofd-spacing versus sin2 psi is the strain of the part. Additionally, whensin2 psi and d-spacing from two separate detectors are plotted on asingle graph, any separation between the two plottings indicates thatshear stress is present in the part.

Conveniently, this type of information can be displayed to a viewer.Specifically, a two-dimensional graph 812 includes a mapping of sin2 psiversus D-spacing from the report 810. The graph 812 shows a firstplotting 811 for values at a first detector and a second plotting 813for values at a second detector. Thus, in this example, a user canexamine the lines 811 and 813, determine that the lines do not coincide,and determine that shear stress is present.

The report 810 may be used by the viewer to determine the exact value ofstress at the particular point associated with the report. This isadvantageous in situations where the viewer needs to know the exactvalue to determine if the value exceeds a threshold. In the case of FIG.8, the operator may have to determine if the stress at a point exceeds12 ksi, examined the stress graph 802, and was unable to ascertain theexact value of stress at that point on the part. However, the operatorcan generate the report 810 and see that the stress value 12.469 ksi.Hence, the operator can take appropriate action based upon viewing thereport.

Referring now to FIG. 9, yet another example of a display is depicted.The display illustrated in FIG. 9 includes a three-dimensional graph902. Two planes 904 and 906 pass through the three-dimensional graph902. Plane 904 lies in the x and z-directions and plane 906 lies in they and z-directions. The information contained within the two planes 904and 906 is transposed onto two charts 908 and 910 shown at the bottomright portion of the display. The first chart 908 illustrates valuesfrom the three-dimensional graph as a function of x-position and thesecond chart 910 illustrates values from the three-dimensional graph asa function of y-position.

In addition, the display includes an isobar map 912 derived from thethree-dimensional graph 902. This isobar map 912, to the right of thethree-dimensional map 902, shows a two-dimensional projection of thethree-dimensional graph 902 where measurement values falling withincertain ranges are given the same color. The isobar map is color codedso that the operator can easily determine variations in the materialcharacteristic. For example, it can be seen that several regions haveexcessive high and low values. On the top, the display also includes twographs 914 and 916 giving the x-ray diffraction information as measuredat a first detector and as measured at a second detector. As can beseen, the intensity of the diffraction peaks at about the same angle foreach of the detectors.

Referring now to FIG. 10, still another example of a display isillustrated. The display includes a three-dimensional graph 1004 ofstress, diffraction peak measurements graphs 1006 and 1007, a stressreport 1002, and a graph 1003 of D-spacing versus sine squared psi.

The two diffraction peak graphs show that the diffraction peak intensityis maximized at a particular angle at both detectors. The graph 1004shows that stress is maximized at a particular point. The remainingareas of the graph show that stress is low for the area shown of thepart under test. The graph 1004 may reflect that the part under test hasa particular problem at the point of high stress. If this is thesituation, then the operator may perform some action, for instance, pullthe part or perform further tests. The report 1002 shows various valuesas measured at two detectors. Some of these are graphed (D-spacingversus sin2 psi) in graph 1003 so that the operator may make adetermination as to whether strain and shear stress are present.

Referring now to FIG. 11, another example of a display is illustrated.This display shows three-dimensional graphs, aligned along a commonz-axis to facilitate making easy comparisons. A stress graph 1102indicates that stress is maximized in an area 1102. This may indicate tothe operator that the part under test is exhibiting problems in thatarea and that further action is required. A graph 1103 shows the stresserror over the area of the part under test. It can be seen that theerror varies considerably from point to point, although it is maximizedat particular points. A graph 1104 shows the intensity ratio for thearea of the part under test. Again, as can be easily seen, the intensityratio varies considerably over the area of the part under test reachingmaximums at several points. Finally, a graph 1105 shows the average peakbreath for the area of the part under test. Again, this varies widelyover the part under test with no sole maximum or minimum areas.

The scales for each of the graphs 1101, 1103, 1104, and 1105 have beencustom set by the user. Thus, the scale for the graph 1101 is 874.6 to−271.1 psi; the scale for the graph 1103 is 10.5 to 0.0; the scale forthe graph 1104 is 1.1 to 1.0 and the scale for the graph 11-5 is 3.3 to3.0. Setting the scale to a uniform range would not be acceptable orconvenient for viewing since a scale that shows distinct variations instress would not show variations in intensity ratio very well.

The display of the graphs on top of each other facilitating the visualcomparisons of the characteristics. For example, if the operator werelooking for particular areas of the graph where stress were high, theywould easily identify the area 1102 of the graph 1101 as an area of highstress. If they were also looking for where the error, intensity ratio,and average peak breath were not uniform but varied considerably, theycould also easily identify that the other graphs 1103, 1104, and 1105fit that criteria. Thus, the operator could easily take further actionupon making a visual evaluation of the graphs 1101, 1103, 1104, and1105.

Referring now to FIG. 12, yet another example of a display is described.This display shows four graphs 1202, 1206, 1208, and 1210 aligned alongthe vertical z-axis. Specifically, the graph 1202 shows stress. As canbe seen, stress varies considerably over the area of the part under testbeing tested. Planes 1203 and 1204 are used to show how stress varies intwo dimensions. The graph 1220 shows the section 1204 where stress isgraphed as a function of x-position. Similarly, the graph 1222 shows thesection 1203 where stress is graphed in the y-direction. It can be seenthat in the graphs 1220 and 1222, stress varies but reaches its highestvalue in the y-direction.

The graph 1212 is an isobar graph of stress. It can be seen that stressreaches a peak value in the bottom right portion of the graph 1212. Itis apparent that a viewer can examine the isobar graph 1212 and easilydetermine the locations of the maximum and minimum values of stress.

The graph 1206 shows stress error. As can be seen, stress error variesconsiderably over the area of the part under test being tested. The sameplanes 1203 and 1204 are used to show how stress error varies in twodimensions. The graph 1224 shows the section 1204 where stress error isgraphed as a function of x-position. Similarly, the graph 1226 shows thesection 1203 where stress error is graphed in the y-direction. It can beseen that in the graphs 1224 and 1226, stress error varies but reachesits highest value in the x-direction.

The graph 1214 is an isobar graph of stress error. It can be seen thatthe peaks of stress error are easily discernable as dark colors in theupper part of the graph 1214. As with stress, it is apparent that aviewer can examine the isobar graph 1212 and easily determine thelocations of the maximum and minimum values of stress error.

The graph 1208 shows intensity ratio. As can be seen, intensity ratiovaries considerably over the area of the part under test being tested.The same planes 1203 and 1204 are used to show how intensity ratiovaries in two dimensions. The graph 1228 shows the section 1204 whereintensity ratio is graphed as a function of x-position. Similarly, thegraph 1230 shows the section 1203 where intensity ratio is graphed inthe y-direction. It can be seen that for the graphs 1228 and 1230intensity ratio varies but does not reach overall peaks as in the graphsrelated to stress and stress error.

The graph 1218 is an isobar graph of intensity ratio. It can be seenthat the intensity ratio is more uniform over the coverage area andlacks the strong highs and lows present in the other isobar graphs.

The graph 1210 shows average peak FWHM. As can be seen, average peakFWHM varies considerably over the area of the part under test beingtested. The same planes 1203 and 1204 are used to show how average peakFWHM varies in two dimensions. The graph 1234 shows the section 1204where intensity ratio is graphed as a function of x-position. Similarly,the graph 1236 shows the section 1203 where intensity ratio is graphedin the y-direction. It can be seen that for the graphs 1234 and 1236intensity ratio varies widely in both directions.

The graph 1216 is an isobar graph of intensity ratio. It can be seenthat there are several peaks in the upper portion of the graph that areeasily detectable by the viewer. As with stress and stress error, it isapparent that a viewer can examine the isobar graph 1212 and easilydetermine the locations of the maximum and minimum values of averagepeak FWHM.

It can be seen that the display in FIG. 12 can be used in a multitude ofways to aid an operator in determining the reliability of the part undertest. In one example, the viewer can examine the graphs 1202, 1206,1208, and 1210 to easily compare the measured values of the materialcharacteristics. Then, the viewer may determine that they are interestedin viewing the characteristics only in the planes 1203 and 1204. Theplanes 1203 and 1204 can be defined by the user, applied to each of thegraphs, and the plurality of x and y cross sectional graphs generated.Then, the user may compare the cross sectional graphs to each other tofurther the comparison, for example comparing the x-cross section ofstress 1220 to the x-cross section of stress error 1224. Finally, theuser can easily examine the isobar graphs to determine where therelative peaks were to determine if there were areas of interestrequiring further investigation.

Referring now to FIG. 13, one example of an energy measurement system asdisclosed in pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/390,479, filed Mar. 1,2003, used to obtain measurements is next described. In this example,the energy measurement system is an x-ray diffraction apparatus 1310 andincludes a modular x-ray goniometer head 1312 that is detachablyconnected to a base unit 1314 for taking x-ray diffraction measurementsfrom various parts such as the illustrated gear 1316 rigidly held byfixturing 1317 below. The x-ray head can be shifted in a plurality ofdifferent linear directions such as in the vertical z-axis direction aswell as in the lateral y-axis direction, as shown. X-axis fore and aftdirection shifting can also be provided as well as rotary or pivotshifting of the head 1312 about different pivot axes. A common driveassembly 1318 shifts the x-ray tube head assembly 1312, and particularlythe emitter or collimator 1320 depending from the tube housing 1312 a atthe forward end portion thereof in arcuate path 1322 so that as the tubeoscillates back and forth in its arcuate path 1322, x rays are directedat the region on the part 1316 from a variety of different angles toprovide several different dat points from which measurement informationcan be gleaned. Frame 1319 of the base unit 1314 can support both thepart 1316 along with its fixturing 1317 and the drive assembly 1318.

Also, specially dedicated x-ray heads can be used of various sizes. Inone example, the x-ray head 1312 can be employed where higher powerrequirements are required for generating x-rays to take measurementsfrom a particular part material, whereas smaller heads can be used wherethe power is not as critical and access to difficult part geometries isneeded. In particular, smaller heads can be maneuvered into confinedspaces such as found inside on the interior of tubular parts for takingx-ray measurements from the interior surfaces thereof. Head assembly isspecially adapted for taking measurements from small through bores thatare of a relatively shallow depth such as the illustrated bolt holesfound in aircraft rotor discs.

Beyond size, the modular heads can be tailored in several other respectsas well. For example, the wavelength generated for the x-rays can betailored to the material to be measured so as to better match thelattice structure thereof. The beam shape can be tailored to the pieceto be measured as by providing different collimators 1320 on the variousx-ray heads. For example, for those pieces that have surfaces in longnarrow crevices or holes that are desired to be measured, the collimator1320 can be configured to generate a narrower x-ray beam to avoidmeasurement errors.

In addition to the collimator, an x-ray detector assembly is provided ascarried by each of the x-ray heads including x-ray detectors or sensors1338 and 1340 that are typically mounted on either side of thecollimator 1320 via an arcuate x-ray mount 1342. The detectors may beany type of sensors used to detect x-rays, for instance, fiber opticsensors. The x-ray heads can have the position of these detectors 1338relative to the collimator 1320 varied along the mount 1342 or ondifferently sized mounts 1342 from one head to the other so that theyare matched with the x-ray wavelength generated by the head and theresponse of the material for which the x-ray head is to be used fortaking x-ray diffraction measurements from. The mount 1342 itself can beshifted to provide for different measurement techniques or toaccommodate different diffraction angles such as in assembly head. As isapparent, the provision of modular x-ray heads enables much greaterflexibility in tailoring the apparatus to the particular needs of thex-ray diffraction operation that is to take place without necessitatingseveral different x-ray diffraction units for this purpose.

An electronic control system 1343 can be used that can interconnect thesensors 1338 and 1340 on the mount 1342 to the control system 1343. Thelink between the electronic control system 1343 and the sensors on themount 1342 may be any electrical link, for instance, an electrical orfiber optic cable. The electronic control system 1343 may control themovement and operation of the sensors 1338 and 1340 as well as theemitter 1320. The electronic control system 1343 is further coupled tothe display processing system, for instance, the controller 102 in FIG.1, and this connection may also be by electrical or fiber optic cable.

Referring now to FIG. 14, one example of a graph showing thecharacteristics of an evaluation guide is illustrated. As shown in FIG.14, a line 1402 is used to graphically display the relationship betweenstress and shear stress. As can be seen, the line 1402 defines a linearrelationship where, as stress increases, shear stress also increases.The line 1402 may represent an expected relationship or a threshold. Inother words, the line 1402 may indicate a target on or around whichmeasurement values should fall or, alternatively, a threshold where ifvalues fall above or below the line 1402, appropriate action may berequired.

The evaluation guide represented by the line 1402 is graphed in an x,yplane and, consequently, test measurement resultants, representing themeasurement values of material characteristics can be plotted againstthe guide values. For instance, for a point on the part under testhaving a stress measurement value of S1 and a strain measurement valueof SS1, a test measurement resultant of (S1,SS1) can be formed.Conveniently, this test measurement resultant can be plotted as a point(i.e., (S1, SS1)) on the graph with S1 representing a value on thex-axis and SS1 representing a value on the y-axis. The location of thepoint (S1,SS1) can be compared to the line 1402 and an action taken asdescribed herein.

While there have been illustrated and described particular embodimentsof the present invention, it will be appreciated that numerous changesand modifications will occur to those skilled in the art, and it isintended in the appended claims to cover all those changes andmodifications which fall within the true spirit and scope of the presentinvention.

1. A system for displaying graphical information indicative of aplurality of material characteristics for a portion of a part undertest, the system comprising: an energy emitter that directs x-ray energyat a selected portion of a part under test; a single stream ofdiffracted x-ray energy formed by interaction of the x-ray energy withthe selected portion of the part under test, the single stream ofdiffracted x-ray energy being indicative of a plurality of differentfirst order material characteristics of the part under test; an energydetector that detects the single stream of diffracted x-ray energy andforms raw data from the single stream; a controller configured toanalyze the raw data and determine a first one of the plurality ofdifferent first order material characteristics comprising stress and asecond one of the plurality of different first order materialcharacteristics comprising shear stress for the same portion of the partunder test from the raw data, the controller being further programmed toform a first graph relating to the stress and a second graph relating tothe shear stress; an electronic display on which the graphs aregenerated for viewing, the first graph being positioned adjacent to andnon-overlapping with the second graph, the positioning of the firstgraph with the second graph facilitating substantially simultaneousvisual comparisons between the information contained in each of thegraphs in order to determine a condition of the part under test directlyfrom the visual comparisons without the need for further analysis ormanipulation of the graphs.
 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the displaycomprises a single screen on which the first and second graphs aregenerated to allow a viewer to readily analyze and make comparisons andevaluations between the graphs of the material characteristics.
 3. Thesystem of claim 1 wherein the energy detector is configured to detect anenergy form selected from a group consisting of: diffracted energy fromthe selected portion of the part under test and attenuated energy fromthe selected portion of the part under test.
 4. The system of claim 1wherein at least one of the first and second graphs comprises athree-dimensional graph that shows a two-dimensional representation ofthe portion of the part from which measurements are taken and variationsin the measurements for that portion.
 5. The system of claim 1 whereinat least one of the first and second graphs is an isobar graph.
 6. Thesystem of claim 1 wherein the single stream of diffracted energycomprises energy having a single frequency.
 7. The system of claim 1further comprising determining a third one of the plurality of differentfirst order material characteristics comprising retained austenite forthe same portion of the part under test from the raw data and formingand displaying a third graph indicative of the retained austenite, thethird graph being displayed adjacent to at least one of the first graphand the second graph.
 8. The system of claim 7 further comprisingdetermining a fourth one of the plurality of first order materialcharacteristics comprising full width half maximum (FWHM) values of thestress from the raw data and forming and displaying a fourth graphindicative of the FWI-IM values, the fourth graph being displayedadjacent to at least one of the first graph, the second graph, and thethird graph.
 9. The system of claim 1 further comprising determining athird one of the plurality of different first order materialcharacteristics comprising a peak width of the stress from the raw dataand forming and displaying a third graph indicative of the peak width,the third graph being displayed adjacent to at least one of the firstgraph and the second graph.
 10. The system of claim 9 further comprisingdetermining a fourth one of the plurality of different first ordermaterial characteristics comprising full width half maximum (FWHM)values of the stress from the raw data and forming and displaying afourth graph indicative of the FWHM values, the fourth graph beingdisplayed adjacent to at least one of the first graph, the second graph,and the third graph.
 11. A system for displaying graphical informationindicative of a plurality of material characteristics for a portion of apart under test, the system comprising: an energy emitter that directsx-ray energy at a selected portion of a part under test; a single streamof diffracted x-ray energy formed by interaction of the x-ray energywith the selected portion of the part under test, the single stream ofdiffracted x-ray energy being indicative of a plurality of differentfirst order material characteristics of the part under test; an energydetector that detects the single stream of diffracted x-ray energy andforms raw data from the single stream; a controller configured toanalyze the raw data and determine a first one of the plurality ofdifferent first order material characteristics comprising stress and asecond one of the plurality of different first order materialcharacteristics comprising retained austenite for the same portion ofthe part under test from the raw data, the controller being furtherprogrammed to form a first graph relating to the stress and a secondgraph relating to the retained austenite; an electronic display on whichthe graphs are generated for viewing, the first graph being positionedadjacent to and non-overlapping with the second graph, the positioningof the first graph with the second graph facilitating substantiallysimultaneous visual comparisons between the information contained ineach of the graphs in order to determine a condition of the part undertest directly from the visual comparisons without the need for furtheranalysis or manipulation of the graphs.
 12. The system of claim 11further comprising determining a third one of the plurality of differentfirst order material characteristics comprising full width half maximum(FWHM) values of the stress from the raw data and forming and displayinga third graph indicative of the FWHM, the third graph being displayedadjacent to at least one of the first graph and the second graph. 13.The system of claim 12 further comprising determining a fourth one ofthe plurality of different first order material characteristicscomprising a peak breadth of the stress from the raw data and formingand displaying a fourth graph indicative of the peak breadth of thestress, the fourth graph being displayed adjacent to at least one of thefirst graph, the second graph, and the third graph.
 14. The system ofclaim 11 further comprising determining a third one of the plurality ofdifferent first order material characteristics comprising the peakbreadth of the stress from the raw data and forming and displaying athird graph indicative of the peak breadth, the third graph beingdisplayed adjacent to at least one of the first graph and the secondgraph.
 15. The system of claim 11 wherein the display comprises a singlescreen on which the first and second graphs are generated to allow aviewer to readily analyze and make comparisons and evaluations betweenthe graphs of the material characteristics.
 16. The system of claim 11wherein the energy detector is configured to detect an energy formselected from a group consisting of: diffracted energy from the selectedportion of the part under test and attenuated energy from the selectedportion of the part under test.
 17. The system of claim 11 wherein atleast one of the first and second graphs comprises a three-dimensionalgraph that shows a two-dimensional representation of the portion of thepart from which measurements are taken and variations in themeasurements for that portion.
 18. The system of claim 11 wherein atleast one of the first and second graphs is an isobar graph.
 19. Thesystem of claim 11 wherein the single stream of diffracted energycomprises energy having a single frequency.